6 ms·

Got any hard evidence for these anecdotes? Your comment reads very poorly and is likely against the community guidelines here.

DarkWiiPlayer 6y ago
> Your comment reads very poorly and is likely against the community guidelines here I agree with the first part, but what about it would be against any guidelines?
- sonotathrowaway 6y ago
  Aggressively slandering and smearing racial groups on the basis of made-up anecdata seems the definition of flame-baiting to me.
  - DarkWiiPlayer 6y ago
    > on the basis of made-up anecdata And you're now accusing them of having made stuff up? How is that any better? Isn't the left all about respecting peoples subjective life experiences?
    - sonotathrowaway 6y ago
      To be clear for future context, you’re defending the now flagged & deleted comment that said all black people hate white people as “his life experience”. Do you honestly think that was his life’s experience - that every single minority he’s met has expressed hatred towards him? It seems pretty clear that you’re concern trolling here and not arguing in good faith. Or maybe you’re not, and you genuinely believe that /rjkennedy98 has met every black person and knows us well enough to judge our hearts. Can you please explain if you think he’s met every black person, that he can pass group judgement?
    - Red_Leaves_Flyy 6y ago
      It seems to have been made up. Upthread I asked for citations. Instead they picked another comment to continue their flamebaiting with a few irrelevant cherries thrown in to move the goalposts.
    - dang 6y ago
      Please stop.
- dang 6y ago
  It was extreme flamebait, to the point of being a bannable offense.
sonotathrowaway 6y ago
When you dislike black people, the proof is supposed to be implicit - you’re just supposed to agree with them, or else they’ll start with their stormfront sales pitch. In reality, black people make up 13.4% of Americans, so the chances that most Americans are steeped around blacks that hate them is usually very low. Much more common are mentally unstable white men who accost you for your skin color (pretty common, especially during the last two election), and the “white moderates” who hate your skin color but need to find socially acceptable ways to express that.
- rjkennedy98 6y ago
  > When you dislike black people I don't personally dislike Black people (but thanks for accusing me), I'm just a realist and I think universal standards are absolutely critical to having a peaceful and successful country. You mention facts, but if your group views any failure to meet universal standards whether they be academic merit standards, hate speech standards, crime standards, ect as white oppression facts don't even matter. This is why we have new rules so that Blacks get into college with drastically worse scores than everyone else. Now, your group is using your power to simply remove test scores all together as a standard since tests are racist. You lobby for hate speech rules so they don't affect your group (as Facebook is being pressured to do). Eventually you start saying that statistics, truth, and virtue are actually parts of "white culture" that is oppressive itself (as the African American museum did (1)). Next phase we now entering in (which I fear), we simply deny that white people even exist as the AP has made a journalistic standard (3) and we say that objectivity itself isn't real (2). You call that "justice" I supposed, but it doesn't matter because you assume it is done in good faith. I think its pretty obvious that it is not done in good faith and is extremely dangerous, but Black people as a rule view Black power as inherently benign, despite plenty of evidence of the contrary (South Africa and Zimbabwe where whites were forced to emigrate). 1. https://thefederalist.com/2020/07/15/smithsonian-pushes-racist-material-claiming-white-culture-is-nuclear-family-self-reliance-being-polite/ https://thefederalist.com/2020/07/15/smithsonian-pushes-raci... 2. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/23/opinion/objectivity-black-journalists-coronavirus.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/23/opinion/objectivity-black... 3. https://apnews.com/article/7e36c00c5af0436abc09e051261fff1f https://apnews.com/article/7e36c00c5af0436abc09e051261fff1f
rjkennedy98 6y ago
> The top three derogatory terms Facebook’s automated systems removed were “white trash,” a gay slur and “cracker,” according to an internal chart obtained by The Post Literally in the article it says that anti-white comments by blacks were the top hate speech comments made. I’d like to hear your explanation why they needed to turn off the anti-white comment filter. Seems pretty obvious that there were so many of them that they had to turn it off or risk alienating certain groups (which is also corroborated by the article). What other explanation could there be? You can't possibly believe that this was done because there were so many critical race theory students that had trouble de-constructing whiteness on Facebook which apparently is Facebook's ridiculous position.

DarkWiiPlayer 6y ago

> Your comment reads very poorly and is likely against the community guidelines here I agree with the first part, but what about it would be against any guidelines?

sonotathrowaway 6y ago
Aggressively slandering and smearing racial groups on the basis of made-up anecdata seems the definition of flame-baiting to me.
- DarkWiiPlayer 6y ago
  > on the basis of made-up anecdata And you're now accusing them of having made stuff up? How is that any better? Isn't the left all about respecting peoples subjective life experiences?
  - sonotathrowaway 6y ago
    To be clear for future context, you’re defending the now flagged & deleted comment that said all black people hate white people as “his life experience”. Do you honestly think that was his life’s experience - that every single minority he’s met has expressed hatred towards him? It seems pretty clear that you’re concern trolling here and not arguing in good faith. Or maybe you’re not, and you genuinely believe that /rjkennedy98 has met every black person and knows us well enough to judge our hearts. Can you please explain if you think he’s met every black person, that he can pass group judgement?
  - Red_Leaves_Flyy 6y ago
    It seems to have been made up. Upthread I asked for citations. Instead they picked another comment to continue their flamebaiting with a few irrelevant cherries thrown in to move the goalposts.
  - dang 6y ago
    Please stop.
dang 6y ago
It was extreme flamebait, to the point of being a bannable offense.

sonotathrowaway 6y ago

When you dislike black people, the proof is supposed to be implicit - you’re just supposed to agree with them, or else they’ll start with their stormfront sales pitch. In reality, black people make up 13.4% of Americans, so the chances that most Americans are steeped around blacks that hate them is usually very low. Much more common are mentally unstable white men who accost you for your skin color (pretty common, especially during the last two election), and the “white moderates” who hate your skin color but need to find socially acceptable ways to express that.

rjkennedy98 6y ago
> When you dislike black people I don't personally dislike Black people (but thanks for accusing me), I'm just a realist and I think universal standards are absolutely critical to having a peaceful and successful country. You mention facts, but if your group views any failure to meet universal standards whether they be academic merit standards, hate speech standards, crime standards, ect as white oppression facts don't even matter. This is why we have new rules so that Blacks get into college with drastically worse scores than everyone else. Now, your group is using your power to simply remove test scores all together as a standard since tests are racist. You lobby for hate speech rules so they don't affect your group (as Facebook is being pressured to do). Eventually you start saying that statistics, truth, and virtue are actually parts of "white culture" that is oppressive itself (as the African American museum did (1)). Next phase we now entering in (which I fear), we simply deny that white people even exist as the AP has made a journalistic standard (3) and we say that objectivity itself isn't real (2). You call that "justice" I supposed, but it doesn't matter because you assume it is done in good faith. I think its pretty obvious that it is not done in good faith and is extremely dangerous, but Black people as a rule view Black power as inherently benign, despite plenty of evidence of the contrary (South Africa and Zimbabwe where whites were forced to emigrate). 1. https://thefederalist.com/2020/07/15/smithsonian-pushes-racist-material-claiming-white-culture-is-nuclear-family-self-reliance-being-polite/ https://thefederalist.com/2020/07/15/smithsonian-pushes-raci... 2. https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/23/opinion/objectivity-black-journalists-coronavirus.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/06/23/opinion/objectivity-black... 3. https://apnews.com/article/7e36c00c5af0436abc09e051261fff1f https://apnews.com/article/7e36c00c5af0436abc09e051261fff1f

rjkennedy98 6y ago

> The top three derogatory terms Facebook’s automated systems removed were “white trash,” a gay slur and “cracker,” according to an internal chart obtained by The Post Literally in the article it says that anti-white comments by blacks were the top hate speech comments made. I’d like to hear your explanation why they needed to turn off the anti-white comment filter. Seems pretty obvious that there were so many of them that they had to turn it off or risk alienating certain groups (which is also corroborated by the article). What other explanation could there be? You can't possibly believe that this was done because there were so many critical race theory students that had trouble de-constructing whiteness on Facebook which apparently is Facebook's ridiculous position.