> It was a fundamental trade-off inherent to PC computing, and now we don’t have to make it I wonder how many of the currently accepted trade-offs are actually

> It was a fundamental trade-off inherent to PC computing, and now we don’t have to make it I wonder how many of the currently accepted trade-offs are actually false. At low levels it's kind of easy to prove, like you can store either more or bigger packages in a truck but not both. But the higher you go, the farther from physics, the more difficult it becomes to know if you're making decisions on what is essentially a flaky trade-off.