> There's some confusion in this question. A log normal distribution is proof enough that multiplication exists. Ha-ha. Maybe it's a good reason to forge the e

> There's some confusion in this question. A log normal distribution is proof enough that multiplication exists. Ha-ha. Maybe it's a good reason to forge the evidence. However, it doesn't mean you can't forge an additive law here! In 3 you can add value of house to the value of car instead of "multiplying" them. In 7 you can add values "cent by cent". "Multiplicative cycle" in 5 is a real conspiracy theory. Is there the same thing for "cow's milk"? Could you increase milk yield with the same "multiplicative cycle"? According to this logic bank interests for credits with "simple interest" should have a normal distribution and those with "compound interest" should have a log-normal one! I can give you more simple criteria for all cases above: 1) "The length of comments" can't be negative 2) "Users' dwell time" can't be negative 3) income can't be negative 4) cow's don't suck milk from farmers 5) Law of Gravity works for rainfalls 6) Size rainfall droplets can't be negative 7) Payer is the one who pays 8) "Latency" and "delay" for nodes can't be negative too. It's very likely that it has a log-normal distribution as many other sort of delay.