3 ms·
I think the missing part of the discussion is that the M1 can run fast and hot... It hasn't transcended physics - it's just not being pushed hard enough. Give
by barkingcat 6y ago
I think the missing part of the discussion is that the M1 can run fast and hot... It hasn't transcended physics - it's just not being pushed hard enough.
Give it a 800% overclock and dunk it in liquid nitrogen and then we'll talk.
- gwbas1c 6y agoMakes me wonder what's going to happen when we have ARM-based desktop computers and gaming rigs.
- KSteffensen 6y agoMaybe we'll finally be able to run Crysis at max settings
- AstralStorm 6y agoIt will conk out at rather low clocks as the design is not using as many high frequency tricks such as local clocks, instead going for high efficiency.
- hinkley 6y agoNo device this is going in has a large TDP budget. A unit tuned for a desktop heat sink will put in some interesting numbers. I'm curious to see when they put out a Mac Pro with an M-series chip. Or if server is ever coming back.
- kmano8 6y agoThe distinction here is between "fast" and "fast_er_". It isn't that it can't run faster and hot (because of course it could) .. but that it's able to achieve fast performance relative to the competition without having to get "hot".
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- fctorial 6y agofor i in 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8; do cat /dev/urandom > /dev/null & done