5 ms·
They really aren’t - if they’re open to liability claims from a vaccine they developed in months, vs the usual decade+ timeframe there is no reason for them to
by olliej 6y ago
They really aren’t - if they’re open to liability claims from a vaccine they developed in months, vs the usual decade+ timeframe there is no reason for them to distribute the vaccine. If anything it actively compels delaying so that they can get a better idea of the risk.
Whether or not you think the trade off is worth it is reasonable.
Spouting nonsense about “hidden” reasons is conspiracy theory nonsense.
- RobertRoberts 6y ago> "... there is no reason for them to distribute the vaccine." If this were true, then it would apply equally to all medicines with the same risk levels. But it doesn't.