3 ms·
Right, and to clarify, that reason is that it "interferes with God's plan." Interestingly, however, the man who would become Pope John Paul I was sympathetic t
by pmiller2 6y ago
Right, and to clarify, that reason is that it "interferes with God's plan."
Interestingly, however, the man who would become Pope John Paul I was sympathetic to the idea of artificial contraception: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_theology_of_John_Paul_I#Contraception https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Moral_theology_of_John_Paul_I#...
Some conspiracy theorists believe he was murdered for his beliefs in this area.
- asveikau 6y ago> interferes with God's plan. If you believe in such a thing, wouldn't the invention of IVF and its use be part of the plan? If not, how did God let it happen?! I know this is a very literal interpretation. I sometimes feel similarly when people contrast "man-made" with "natural", since surely man is part of nature.
- crispyporkbites 6y agoIt’s not logical- it’s just a way to rationalize their behaviour and make them feel good about the tough parts of life and death.
- young_unixer 6y agoI sometimes think that political ideologies are the same thing, but with a different façade.
- xeyownt 6y agoYeah, problem is that God is not a singleton. Well, it meant to be, but unfortunately, before God appeared, appropriate locking and concurrency was not created yet. So lock-free mechanism was used instead, and it ... failed. So now we have two gods. Clearly quantum theory prevents two gods to occupy the same state. That's why they have different plan.