4 ms·
DeepMind actually solved harder problems than most of the ones mentioned. All the proteins mentioned in the article (except for the chaperones) are 100 amino-ac
by lowkeynthorough 6y ago
DeepMind actually solved harder problems than most of the ones mentioned. All the proteins mentioned in the article (except for the chaperones) are 100 amino-acid and shorter, the therapeutic ones are even shorter, dozen(s) of AA. Thus, great preview of what is to come, though its from (2017). C&EN is truly the quantamagazine of biochem...
- catominor 6y agosorry, I think I'm out of the loop, what do you mean regarding the quanta magazine reference? Is that a good or bad thing?
- est 6y agoI guess it's good for outsiders but pretty bad, inaccurate and overhyped for insiders.
- arolihas 6y agoWait quanta is bad? I like their articles damn...
- Enginerrrd 6y agoI wouldn't call quanta overhyped. Implications are at best embellished very modestly for entertainment purposes, but they do a very good job of staying true to the original paper and communicating some of the main ideas in a less-dumbed-down version than SA, and less ridiculously inaccurate/overhyped way than say physorg. Maybe the physics/math editor/writers are better than the biology. I don't read the bio articles, so I can't comment directly about them. I just read the compsci/physics/math and they're not that bad.