You're assuming that someone's own interpretation of justice differs majorly from someone else's justice. Both unnamed and anonymous. Which seems like a pecul

You're assuming that someone's own interpretation of justice differs majorly from someone else's justice. Both unnamed and anonymous. Which seems like a peculiar position when put like that. Would you like to add some qualifiers? I'm guessing that you equate other justice as laid down by by some benevolent and learned body of people. All senses of justice come from somewhere humble.