2 ms·
Physical dominance found many abstract gutters to empty into, and necessarily so. It was literally destroying the world with violence. The Roman identity was l
by runawaybottle 6y ago
Physical dominance found many abstract gutters to empty into, and necessarily so. It was literally destroying the world with violence.
The Roman identity was literally built on conquering. It took a long time until we were able to say ‘yeah, why can’t this small little land mass be it’s own country?’. Why would a country have to fight for independence? Can you imagine that in today’s society? It’s absurd. Yet, many of our countries had to ... fight for independence. What kind of world was that? A world where dominance wasn’t an undercurrent?
Intellectual dominance hasn’t found socially acceptable gutters, it literally pays in society. Esports and video games is a band aid. The underlying trait is dominance. I can’t prove my thesis in two paragraphs I suppose, but you’ll have to forgive me for that.
Dominant behavior is dysfunctional, and since it is an underlying human trait, it reincarnates itself constantly. Racism and classism are all forms of it, under the umbrella of elitism.
Why can’t my unfit brother go to the same gym I worked hard to get into? Sounds crazy right? Well he’s fat, he didn’t earn it, etc. We don’t even contemplate this anymore physically. Yet, why can’t someone also work at Google because they aren’t the best? Intellectualism at the moment rejects ‘it takes a village’, and it rejects ‘the hand cannot say I am not of the body’.
So be it, it’s just the dark ages. One day we’ll figure it out, as we did with the other manifestation of dominance.
My most serious point is this - the nonsense cannot and should not affect people’s livelihoods. Find the abstract gutter for the nonsense already, and do not fuck with people with your meta game.
- YeezyMode 6y agoWould you agree that the fastest/least harmful way to get to that place is to codify practices/laws at the level of a nation-state, or do you think that's ridiculous and it'll just be some organic development of individuals opting for that type of behavior?
- runawaybottle 6y agoSo, I’ll give away a little bit of my teenage naivety (pretty old now relative to my 20s, still a child to some here) in that lately I’ve been influenced by some serious reading on the Holocaust and Nazi-Soviet dystopian ideas. In a sense, we really didn’t see the insanity until it fulfilled it’s natural conclusion (a disgusting simile to the final solution). Such a pattern is more common place amongst addicts, who basically need to bottom out until they get it. The sadness is that I know it must play out before we can come to the table and solve it. In other words, there’s no shortcuts, and we have to see it through to the end to prove it, no inductive step. No theory in this.