15 ms·
>Organization is about changing a power balance; it's not just about money. Maybe I fundamentally misunderstand unions having only been in one for a short amou
by jjcon 6y ago
>Organization is about changing a power balance; it's not just about money.
Maybe I fundamentally misunderstand unions having only been in one for a short amount of time but I didn't feel any more empowered by having a union. It was a bunch of union fat cats arguing with corporate fat cats and all in all it just made the work more insufferable.
- brundolf 6y agoI've heard widely varying things about different individual unions. But I think this is true of any power structure: whenever power is acquired, it can be abused by the few - be they politicians or CEOs or union leaders - or it can be held onto by the many and used for the general improvement of circumstances. There's always the risk of corruption. But speaking very broadly, the higher the number of different powerful parties competing with each other, the better. In literal terms: I'd tend to think having union fat cats arguing with corporate fat cats is better than having only corporate fat cats, who are free to do whatever they please.
- AshWolfy 6y agoUnion workers have better pay, better benefits, more job security, etc. Many unions are shitty, but even a job with a shitty union is better than a job with no union