3 ms·
If you call that “collectively organizing”, I guess that proves we don’t need unions. The labor law was all that we needed and it worked as expected. Problem so
by lawnchair_larry 6y ago
If you call that “collectively organizing”, I guess that proves we don’t need unions. The labor law was all that we needed and it worked as expected. Problem solved!
- caconym_ 6y agoIt's possible I don't understand your point, but it seems fairly obvious to me that doing a little bit of a thing doesn't mean you can't benefit immensely from doing more of it. Hungry? Eat a cracker and you may be less so—and it may even make a material difference to your survival in an extreme situation—but it won't replace a full meal.
- lawnchair_larry 6y agoI agree that we should continue doing more things like the example given, also without using a labor union.
- madeofpalk 6y agoA union is often how these sorts of things get passed into law.