Is it even going against the grain? The trope of the UN and their strongly worded letters has existed and been popularized for at least as long as I can rememb

Is it even going against the grain? The trope of the UN and their strongly worded letters has existed and been popularized for at least as long as I can remember. Is it really "against the grain" to simply make a call to their ineffectual, flaccid and outright farcical nature? And if one really wants to debate their farcical nature, one need only look at their most recent candidates for election to the Human Rights Council. Or their recent Universal Periodic Review where some of the worst modern assailants on human rights lined up for the 2 minutes hate in the name of virtue toward the USA. If someone is willing to defend the UN and prove they're anything but a farce, I'm all ears.