3 ms·
It’s hard for me to relate, because I just don’t see “edit; reload” as being that important. I think the difference is I write tests. I usually code everything
by apeace 6y ago
It’s hard for me to relate, because I just don’t see “edit; reload” as being that important.
I think the difference is I write tests. I usually code everything while writing/running tests. Then it always works the first time I run it, so there’s no need for “edit; reload”.
- munk-a 6y agoI really like working in PHP but I'd actually agree that edit;reload is a virtue of the language (in the environment everyone normally assumes it's running in) that is losing value. This virtue was incredibly valuable to me when I was throwing a website together with ducttape and bubble gum and it was the only way (that I knew of) to be able to clearly and quickly see the results of my changes. With tests in the picture I think it loses a lot of that value - it still has some since nobody likes writing front-end tests but most of your code changes should be "proven" by some level of automated test coverage.
- recursivedoubts 6y agoOh, you were asking about benefits that you can easily relate to. Well, in that case then you'd be in a much better position to answer than I am.
- pavel_lishin 6y ago> I think the difference is I write tests. I usually code everything while writing/running tests. Then it always works the first time I run it, so there’s no need for “edit; reload”. I write tests, too. I guess I'm not as good of a software developer - because just as my code has bugs and unexpected edge cases, so do my tests, and they don't catch every mistake I made, since I'm the one making them.