4 ms·
Thoroughly delete all traces of software that you no longer use. This is just a waste of time. Do you really care about 70KB that some lib that some other lib
by mapleoin 15y ago
Thoroughly delete all traces of software that you no longer use.
This is just a waste of time. Do you really care about 70KB that some lib that some other lib that was used by a program that you only used for a week used used?
- wladimir 15y agoIt's not the size on disk that is the problem, I guess. Some software leaves other kinds of stuff behind such as links to it in the registry, license services and startup/taskbar apps which can drag the speed of everything down.
- bigiain 15y agoThat may be true for Windows, bur he's also advocating using only MacOS and Linux/BSD. I think those issues are significantly less common, if not non-existent on those platforms...
- wladimir 15y agoThat's true. As long as you use packages in your distrib format you don't have the problem on Linux. If you manually 'make install' from source it's harder to cleanly get rid of everything. But that's not recommended anyway. Edit: there is some commercial software for Linux has custom installers which can result in windows-ish problems.
- bigiain 15y agoHave you ever/often bumped into problems with 'make install' leaving behind system crashing buts of code as time bombs when you've deleted the original app? My personal experience is that if that sort of cruft accumulates in Linux, it happens at a slow enough rate that system upgrades fix the problem before it manifests.
- wladimir 15y agoWell a lot of mechanisms in Linux work by dropping files in a certain path (SysV init scripts, udev files, plugins). So leaving files around could have a little impact, such as runaway error messages, or a slight slowdown at bootup. Then again, it's still much less than in Windows. And it's more transparent, resolving the problem is generally a matter of removing the file, instead of going into the registry jungle "trying random stuff from the internet until it works".