TempleOS was practically straightforward by comparison. The language it's written in is almost (but not quite) C, and it generally follows the design patterns o

TempleOS was practically straightforward by comparison. The language it's written in is almost (but not quite) C, and it generally follows the design patterns of an older (perhaps early-90s?) software application. It's certainly got its weird aspects, but they exist at a higher level -- in its self-imposed design constraints and naming conventions, for example.