3 ms·
If this were a true random event, then near misses with 5 out of 6 sequential digits would be far more frequent, but I have never heard of one. So that says thi
by dave333 6y ago
If this were a true random event, then near misses with 5 out of 6 sequential digits would be far more frequent, but I have never heard of one. So that says this is non-random somehow.
- triangleman 6y agoconfirmation bias, availability heuristic