Considering many machines run windows I'm going to go with a resounding "no" wrt to "being secure", however saying something is 'insecure' is not the same thing

Considering many machines run windows I'm going to go with a resounding "no" wrt to "being secure", however saying something is 'insecure' is not the same thing as "this has been hacked". Most computers are horribly insecure - not all computers are hacked. Having said that, Col Waldron mentioned in that hearing that they have pcaps of traffic going from one or more machines on election night to servers in Germany. That's a very very crazy claim to make so if they can produce that evidence under oath (and how that was obtained is not super clear) then there's going to be problems. I think it'd hinge on that.