The logic in the article is a little strained. The 'contract officials' are 'doomed' because they have to chose between competing senior officials, many of whi

The logic in the article is a little strained. The 'contract officials' are 'doomed' because they have to chose between competing senior officials, many of which will be upset? Then why would anyone take the job? He literally says they are 'coveted' while at the same time '99% chance of failure'? And he indicated that some don't accept bribes. But then, randomly, they might accept one for which they could get caught? How about just don't take bribes? Seriously. I really enjoyed reading this however, I wish there was more real data to analyze as often, it's hard to really ascertain how much of these things are really true or just things that even people with experience and insight happen to believe.