probably based on this: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg00594.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg00... I

probably based on this: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg00594.html https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-devel/2015-02/msg00... I don't understand the bits about RMS' email configuration, but in that message in 2015 he indicated that he did not know about the offer in 2005 to give copyright of LLVM to the FSF.