He then goes on to explain why a detailed understanding of the algorithm is besides the point, so it doesn't matter if he knows the ins and outs of the algorith

He then goes on to explain why a detailed understanding of the algorithm is besides the point, so it doesn't matter if he knows the ins and outs of the algorithm selected to protect bitcoin. I agree that seriously flawed articles that spread misinformation are reasonable targets for flagging, but this is not one of those articles. Dude clearly has a strong opinion about bitcoin, but he makes a substantive case for why he believes his pov without resorting to shenanigans or incredibly stilted framing. Again, if you disagree with him, this is the sort of post that can be rebutted.