5 ms·
So if anything, a naive 'nm' comparison is actually too favorable to Intel? That's amusing, since I've heard it suggested by Intel fanboys that it was the othe
by bigbubba 6y ago
So if anything, a naive 'nm' comparison is actually too favorable to Intel? That's amusing, since I've heard it suggested by Intel fanboys that it was the other way around.
- deleted 6y ago[deleted]
- ksec 6y agoBecause your parent got it mixed up. 170 Mtr/mm2 refers to 5nm. TSMC's 7nm is roughly 100 Mtr/mm2 depending which 7nm you are referring to as TSMC has quite a few variants. So yes, Intel's 10nm is roughly speaking the same as TSMC's 7nm. Just to give another perspective, by the end of 2020, TSMC would have shipped more 5nm wafers then Intel's 10nm has ever shipped.