3 ms·

You said the distinction between a probabilistic world and a deterministic one is incoherent. But if there is no local realism, wouldn't it be more accurate to

You said the distinction between a probabilistic world and a deterministic one is incoherent. But if there is no local realism, wouldn't it be more accurate to describe your position as saying all events are probabilistic rather than none of them?

ikeboy 6y ago
No. All events being probabilistic is still realism, just in a weaker sense than Bell.
- feanaro 6y ago
  Yeah, I'm grasping at straws because I don't really understand what your position is from the things you said in this thread.