2 ms·
Both delicious and flickr had earnings before they were acquired; they just didn't have profits. Since advertising is a proven business model on the web now, th
by sabat 19y ago
Both delicious and flickr had earnings before they were acquired; they just didn't have profits. Since advertising is a proven business model on the web now, this wasn't a concern.
Plenty of Fish seems web2.0 to me; it may not be ajax-enabled, but it's certainly a social network.
There are plenty of entrepreneurs making hundreds of k a month with little to no employees; they just don't brag about it on their blogs.
It was just an example; I could have named any of the other companies you're thinking of to make my point. The point is that they have earnings or at least a solid earnings plan. "Earnings don't matter" is not the web2.0 way.
- sbraford 19y agoPoint taken. Just a nit though: how was del.icio.us making money? I never saw one ad on there before Yahoo acquired them, come to think of it, I still don't see any ads on there.