My problem with you're argument is that you're focused on strategies/ideas/potential. Microsoft's strategy has always been simple, dominate every software marke

My problem with you're argument is that you're focused on strategies/ideas/potential. Microsoft's strategy has always been simple, dominate every software market. There's nothing inherently wrong with that strategy, probably never will be. No one denies the future potential either. It's about execution. Dominating market's is hard. It requires incredible leadership and execution. Execution is no small thing, you can't just assume that once you have the idea you will be able to execute. So while it's fine to believe in Microsoft's future, instead of telling me what is possible, tell me why I should believe they will be able to execute.