> Not sure what these two versions of the blockchain you're talking about are. Really?! One version is "Vitalik's fork" and another one is "non-Vitalik's fork"

> Not sure what these two versions of the blockchain you're talking about are. Really?! One version is "Vitalik's fork" and another one is "non-Vitalik's fork". Which one of them is a valid chain? Any idea? Assume the attacker is Vitalik and there an "evidence" of his attack. Who will dare to slash him? Vitalik won't include this evidence into "Vitalik's fork". If Vitalik wants to have his own blockchain, nobody cares, isn't it?