3 ms·

Yes, There are two primary things to consider the Risk/Benefit to yourself and the Risk/Benefit to those around you. The answer is still yes for both cases, lo

Yes, There are two primary things to consider the Risk/Benefit to yourself and the Risk/Benefit to those around you. The answer is still yes for both cases, long term covid damage is bad at any age and so is taking out a grandparent, co-worker you like.

refurb 6y ago
the Risk/Benefit to those around you But there is a limited supply. At least in the short-term, if I get a dose, that means someone else doesn't get one. If someone around me is at risk, then they should get vaccinated and I should defer if my risk is low.
- Latty 6y ago
  Generally it isn't on the individual to try to weigh something like that up. Here in the UK, at least, the Vaccine will be offered to people in order, so if you are offered it, there would be no reason to defer—others who need it more should have been offered it before you and you accepting won't deny them anything.
- cr1895 6y ago
  This is why countries and public health departments are discussing and agreeing on who gets a vaccination first - people in care homes, front-line health workers, or perhaps even young, healthy people because they heavily drive the spread. I don't think there's a situation anywhere where it's a free-for-all. Personally, I will take the vaccine as soon as it's made available to me. Even if my risk is perhaps low (which may or may not be true), taking the vaccine reduces the chance that I would spread COVID to someone else. It's a collective effort to reduce the spread, not an individual or selfish one.
rebuilder 6y ago
We don't yet know whether the vaccines prevent infection and transmission AFAIK.
- castis 6y ago
  it would prevent infection and transmission as much as any other vaccine would. you're just priming your immune system to handle something its not actually seen before. you can still get the virus, it will still affect you, but your immune system will recognize and deal with it much much faster. thinking logically, if you are given the virus, your body will still make copies for a short amount of time and you would still be able to give it to someone else. getting the vaccine makes the window of opportunity much smaller and dramatically lowers the risk that you will die from it.
  - rebuilder 6y ago
    I was going by this paper in the Lancet, where they note that it's not clear if the vaccines will provide sterilising immunity in the upper airways: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31976-0/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6... This is from September, though, so maybe more is known about that now. I haven't seen news about that, however.

refurb 6y ago

the Risk/Benefit to those around you But there is a limited supply. At least in the short-term, if I get a dose, that means someone else doesn't get one. If someone around me is at risk, then they should get vaccinated and I should defer if my risk is low.

Latty 6y ago
Generally it isn't on the individual to try to weigh something like that up. Here in the UK, at least, the Vaccine will be offered to people in order, so if you are offered it, there would be no reason to defer—others who need it more should have been offered it before you and you accepting won't deny them anything.
cr1895 6y ago
This is why countries and public health departments are discussing and agreeing on who gets a vaccination first - people in care homes, front-line health workers, or perhaps even young, healthy people because they heavily drive the spread. I don't think there's a situation anywhere where it's a free-for-all. Personally, I will take the vaccine as soon as it's made available to me. Even if my risk is perhaps low (which may or may not be true), taking the vaccine reduces the chance that I would spread COVID to someone else. It's a collective effort to reduce the spread, not an individual or selfish one.

rebuilder 6y ago

We don't yet know whether the vaccines prevent infection and transmission AFAIK.

castis 6y ago
it would prevent infection and transmission as much as any other vaccine would. you're just priming your immune system to handle something its not actually seen before. you can still get the virus, it will still affect you, but your immune system will recognize and deal with it much much faster. thinking logically, if you are given the virus, your body will still make copies for a short amount of time and you would still be able to give it to someone else. getting the vaccine makes the window of opportunity much smaller and dramatically lowers the risk that you will die from it.
- rebuilder 6y ago
  I was going by this paper in the Lancet, where they note that it's not clear if the vaccines will provide sterilising immunity in the upper airways: https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6736(20)31976-0/fulltext https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PIIS0140-6... This is from September, though, so maybe more is known about that now. I haven't seen news about that, however.