3 ms·
That quote makes it seem like the short sellers were betting on economic downturn due to Covid, which they didn't. The trade was made long before in 2018/19 and
by Pyramus 6y ago
That quote makes it seem like the short sellers were betting on economic downturn due to Covid, which they didn't. The trade was made long before in 2018/19 and the economic pressure due to Covid was a lucky coincidence that acted in their favor.
It's not like the CFDs in the article would have stayed up if they hadn't made the trade or made it long.
> "COVID-19 also revealed a dirty secret hidden in the crawlspace upon which many commercial mortgage-backed securities were built. A University of Texas at Austin study published in August claimed that banks knowingly inflated underwriting income for $650 billion worth of commercial real estate mortgages issued between 2013 and 2019, including by 5 percent or more for nearly a third of the roughly 40,000 loans. “A well-documented historical pattern is that fraud thrives in boom periods and is revealed in busts,” the university researchers wrote, adding that end investors were unaware of this hidden risk, a deception akin to buying a Ferrari secretly outfitted with a rusted-out Kia engine. It could be argued that CMBS had been a magic trick all along, with big banks one step ahead, luring investors to pick a card from a rigged deck. It took a global pandemic—an act of God—to reveal this financial sleight of hand."
Isn't that the real scandal?
- onemiketwelve 6y agoYes I agree. Thanks for pointing that out. I didn't expect cherry picking quotes here tbh
- stefan_ 6y agoSo this was a vehicle to profit off the fraud? Unless you attach any weight to the dramatic writing chronicling their "original research" visits to malls.