3 ms·
That sounds _very_ wrong, what type of throughput are we talking about here?
by ramraj07 6y ago
That sounds _very_ wrong, what type of throughput are we talking about here?
- riking 6y agoThe story wasn't wrong, until today. That's why people are celebrating.
- PetahNZ 6y agoUp to hundreds of images per second.
- ramraj07 6y agoOkay that makes sense, when we have very low throughput it looks like consistency wasn't an issue but at that rate (especially if it occurs in bursts) I can see how the prior S3 implementation could fail to scale fast enough