I think there are also some points brought up by Chapelle that deserve quantitative legal scrutiny. Coercion can invalidate a contract. Also, contracts that ar

I think there are also some points brought up by Chapelle that deserve quantitative legal scrutiny. Coercion can invalidate a contract. Also, contracts that are extremely one sided can be legally challenged or that require no consideration from one of the parties. Additionally, contracts based on false information can be invalidated. If I'm starving and I sign a contract to pay all of my future earnings for a plate of food, no court is going to hold up that contract. Obviously, the methods used by these big companies are a higher and more complex level of coercion. But I think they deserve some scrutiny in this regard.