3 ms·
This is pretty standard AWS marketing spiel. They make vague assertions of "ah but you're not considering the big picture...." with no details
by acer4666 6y ago
This is pretty standard AWS marketing spiel. They make vague assertions of "ah but you're not considering the big picture...." with no details
- sushshshsh 6y agoBased. "That's just an edge case. Our customers love this service!" It's like going to a restaurant that uses bottled water instead of tap water, and they dont provide an answer as to what the benefits of bottled water are
- staticassertion 6y agoIf you want to compare two things that are different in a ton of ways, don't be mad when someone points it out.
- ignoramous 6y agoIt isn't about the products, it is about the pricing model in a similar market. Second, for sub 50ms workloads [0], Workers is absolutely a superior solution to API Gateway + Lambda or Cloudfront + Lambda at Edge if the workloads can fit 128MB RAM and package/compile to 1MB JavaScript or WASM executables, in terms of cost, speed, latency, ease of development etc [0] For Workers, 50ms is all CPU time and that is definitely not the case with Lambda which may even charge you for the time it takes to setup the runtime to run the code and time spent doing Network IO and bandwith and RAM and vCPUs and what not.