> Brian's claims that they were simply offering their services in a way that "felt right with what Apple would have wanted" is marketing drivel. It's not only

> Brian's claims that they were simply offering their services in a way that "felt right with what Apple would have wanted" is marketing drivel. It's not only marketing drivel, it's a downright strange statement. I mean with which other product would you consider the wishes of the anthropomorphized business which created the product in terms of how you use it? Normally the product is meant to serve the consumer, not the other way around.