6 ms·
Of course, what's actually not good for you is having to work twelve hours a day. Leisure time isn't the problem.
by ramshorns 6y ago
Of course, what's actually not good for you is having to work twelve hours a day. Leisure time isn't the problem.
- throwaway2245 6y agoThe BBC has turned quite a spin in the sub-headline: "Many young Chinese workers prioritise leisure time over sleep after long work days – even though they know it’s unhealthy." It's clear even from this formulation that what's really been prioritised (and really unhealthy) is the long work day.
- Cthulhu_ 6y agoThank fuck some countries have had workers' revolutions that limit working hours and days - and make employers pay dearly for overtime. I mean there's workarounds like the gig economy, but for most people things are still pretty good.
- Al-Khwarizmi 6y agoExcept for all the demanding jobs where you need to unofficially work outside your working hours... I live in one of those countries with a reasonable working hours limit, but I'm an academic, my partner is a doctor, both of us work "voluntarily" outside working hours. I need to prepare clases, request grants, and do research in a hypercompetitive environment where you need better CV than competitors. She needs to be up to date with the latest findings in medicine. It does work for workers in many sectors, though. I'm not criticizing working hours regulations, far from it - just saying we should probably do more than that.
- toyg 6y agoYou both are well-compensated for that, though. You could choose to be a mediocre academic and she could choose to be a mediocre doctor. It’s a trade-off.
- outworlder 6y agoHigher compensation doesn't increase a day's duration. It also won't provide you immunity to health issues. If the only way to not be 'mediocre' is to sacrifice one's health, there's something wrong.
- anigbrowl 6y agoI need to prepare clases, request grants, and do research in a hypercompetitive environment where you need better CV than competitors. Not to be unsympathetic, but it's baffling to me why academics, who are mainly smart, innovative people, don't band together across disciplines to reshape their environment and wrest control out of the hands of the administrators who frequently make their life a misery.
- titanomachy 6y agoI don't know if administrators are what make academic life difficult. It sounds to me like the parent post is saying that it's difficult because there are lots of really smart and motivated people competing at near-maximum effort for limited resources. That matches my experience in academia. The prof in charge of our lab worked a lot because he was obsessed with the work and wanted to succeed, not because someone was cracking a whip.
- anigbrowl 6y agocompeting at near-maximum effort for limited resources Yes, but why? Most academics I know are miserable and worn ragged by this endless competition. I'm asking why they don't construct a more favorable environment for themselves where they are not constantly being played off against each other. Administrators are part of that system, as opposed to being autonomous villains.
- pjmorris 6y agoI was astonished to see the article treat leisure time as something to be optimized out of people's lives rather than as fundamental to their well being. It's almost like they're trying to normalize a 6 day/72 hour week for everyone.