I read the article. The specific cases mentioned involved missed instructions, interruptions where the test taker let their seat, or the test taker talking. Thi

I read the article. The specific cases mentioned involved missed instructions, interruptions where the test taker let their seat, or the test taker talking. This seems invasive, an invasion of privacy, and unreasonable. I object to the use of this software. But I really don't think they are doing or even being accused of anything like phrenology. I think it weakens the case against this type of software to make inaccurate accusations like that.