4 ms·
This could be huge for the ecosystem. For example, there are ways to use third-party iMessage clients (e.g. through Matrix) that require you to keep a server ru
by ianmobbs 6y ago
This could be huge for the ecosystem. For example, there are ways to use third-party iMessage clients (e.g. through Matrix) that require you to keep a server running on your local macOS machine signed in to your AppleID - this could let developers create hosted versions of those services
- ackbar03 6y agoThis seems super hacky though
- detaro 6y agonot to mention expensive.
- SulfurHexaFluri 6y ago$24/day for imessage.. Much much cheaper to just buy a second hand mac mini and leave it plugged in to your router.
- easton 6y agoOne Mac (serial number) per instance, so you probably couldn’t host iMessage or other access to Apple Services without getting burned after a couple days (and AWS wouldn’t want you doing it and getting a whole rack of Minis banned from iCloud or something).
- thinkingemote 6y agorunning servers (or anything personal) on these instances are forbidden.