3 ms·
Getting rid of accommodations in general is not the right thing to do, and I am very glad that you were able to get the sorts of support you actually needed, as
by bzbarsky 6y ago
Getting rid of accommodations in general is not the right thing to do, and I am very glad that you were able to get the sorts of support you actually needed, as opposed to just the cookie-cutter extra time on exams.
That said, giving time and a half or double time on exams to anyone who takes the time and money to track down a compliant enough medical professional to diagnose them with ADHD is not the right thing either. And yes, some people really do have ADHD and need various support, not limited to extra time on exams, to succeed in the school environments we have created. But _so_ many people are diagnosed with ADHD who have nothing of the sort...
Anecdotally, my acquaintances who teach at elite liberal arts colleges say that 25-40% of their students nowadays are receiving extra-time accommodations, a sharp rise over just 10 years ago. It's possible that the prevalence of ADHD and various mental health issues really is that high amongst high-performing teenagers nowadays; the college admissions crapshoot and lead-up to it surely is not helping with mental health. But I find it much more likely that there's a significant amount of gaming the system going on, unfortunately.
- souprock 6y agoThis would fix the problem: if a student in a course gets an accommodation, all students in that course get the accommodation by default. It would be OK to opt out, so for example we don't force everybody to use a screen reader. (but you get one unless you opt out) Clearly this solves the extra-time fraud.
- thotsBgone 6y agoThe problem with this is that then the legitimate ADHD students are then at a disadvantage to the other students, as they can't use the time as effectively as the other students.