> The corrolary to your message is “don’t build mega-projects” which doesn’t make sense to me. I think the two posters meant that size of the people working on

> The corrolary to your message is “don’t build mega-projects” which doesn’t make sense to me. I think the two posters meant that size of the people working on a single thing is negatively correlated with innovation. The analogy was that Tesla is less ground breaking now compared to when it was experimental. > The corrolary to your message is “don’t build mega-projects” Mega projects are more optimized for delivery and leaving lesser things on luck and it is beneficial in most of the cases. But posters are saying given the vast scope of things that could be tried in fusion space, mega projects likely won't be touching those.