3 ms·
That would be 8 years prior to Ajit Pai. If it makes him incompetent, it also makes his predecessor incompetent. The fact that STIR/SHAKEN required a new law s
by souprock 6y ago
That would be 8 years prior to Ajit Pai. If it makes him incompetent, it also makes his predecessor incompetent.
The fact that STIR/SHAKEN required a new law should be a big hint that the FCC Chairman didn't have the power to fix the issue.
- dredmorbius 6y agoIt means that the problem was highly evident by the time Pai arrived. Taking four years to build political concensis on a decade-old problem sufficient to result in STIR/SHAKEN, dependent or not on Congress, isn't a laudable achievement.