3 ms·
>Not to take away from the argument that we should vaccinate everyone. I'm not sure if this is a concession for argument's sake, but imo it does take away from
by totony 6y ago
>Not to take away from the argument that we should vaccinate everyone.
I'm not sure if this is a concession for argument's sake, but imo it does take away from it. Why do you think it doesn't?
- thelean12 6y agoIt doesn't take away from it because it's never been a good argument. x - 0 still equals x. There are plenty of valid arguments to vaccinate everyone we can.
- totony 6y agoI'm not sure what you mean by x-0, but if there is no risk for young healthy people, then they don't need the vaccine? I understand there are other arguments to be had but this 100% invalidates at least on of them EDIT: After re-reading I understood the sentence, my bad.