4 ms·
Of course it's serious, and you just confirmed it: SF is not "inhabited" by the working poor at all, who are forced to live elsewhere. Unless you're talking abo
by iaabtpbtpnn 6y ago
Of course it's serious, and you just confirmed it: SF is not "inhabited" by the working poor at all, who are forced to live elsewhere. Unless you're talking about the tent cities, I guess. If you can actually afford to live in SF proper, I bet your quality of life is excellent.
- keiferski 6y agoYou are conflating “average person in the country”, aka middle class, with “average person that lives in a specific area.” This is not particularly complicated.
- iaabtpbtpnn 6y agoWhat? I'm not conflating anything. I'm talking about "the average person in SF", exactly as you described in your OP. You can talk about the average person in the country all you want, but this person does not live in SF. I'll stop replying since it seems like we are talking past each other, and I'm attempting to read your posts charitably but I just don't get it.
- shuckles 6y agoTell that to the recent college graduates splitting a dilapidated Victorian with 4 roommates for $1800/mo.