2 ms·
Is this a serious reply? The real world isn’t a logic problem. SF today is mostly inhabited by two groups: the rich and the working poor. The rich can afford t
by keiferski 6y ago
Is this a serious reply? The real world isn’t a logic problem.
SF today is mostly inhabited by two groups: the rich and the working poor. The rich can afford to live wherever they like and take Ubers or corporate shuttles. The working poor commute in on decaying, often dangerous public transit from an hour or more away.
- iaabtpbtpnn 6y agoOf course it's serious, and you just confirmed it: SF is not "inhabited" by the working poor at all, who are forced to live elsewhere. Unless you're talking about the tent cities, I guess. If you can actually afford to live in SF proper, I bet your quality of life is excellent.
- keiferski 6y agoYou are conflating “average person in the country”, aka middle class, with “average person that lives in a specific area.” This is not particularly complicated.
- iaabtpbtpnn 6y agoWhat? I'm not conflating anything. I'm talking about "the average person in SF", exactly as you described in your OP. You can talk about the average person in the country all you want, but this person does not live in SF. I'll stop replying since it seems like we are talking past each other, and I'm attempting to read your posts charitably but I just don't get it.
- shuckles 6y agoTell that to the recent college graduates splitting a dilapidated Victorian with 4 roommates for $1800/mo.