Ok, I can get behind that thought process. I will note that the cited 0.0045% infection fatality rate number is quite old/outdated (June 1st). It's not easy to

Ok, I can get behind that thought process. I will note that the cited 0.0045% infection fatality rate number is quite old/outdated (June 1st). It's not easy to match different areas under the age curve (which seems to be exponential) and that it can vary a lot by region, but here is a review paper which has your number for ages 0-34 (Table 3) and (substantially) higher ones for ages above that: https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160895v7.full.pdf https://www.medrxiv.org/content/10.1101/2020.07.23.20160895v...