3 ms·
None of this is scientifically cause and effect. You are picking correlations which agree with your preferred narrative and extrapolating from there. There is
by zaroth 6y ago
None of this is scientifically cause and effect. You are picking correlations which agree with your preferred narrative and extrapolating from there.
There is very strong evidence that the virus is less contagious to/from children and that schools and daycares are not a significant point of transmission.
1 - https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/risk-comms-updates/update39-covid-and-schools.pdf?sfvrsn=320db233_2 https://www.who.int/docs/default-source/coronaviruse/risk-co...
2 - https://www.npr.org/2020/10/21/925794511/were-the-risks-of-reopening-schools-exaggerated https://www.npr.org/2020/10/21/925794511/were-the-risks-of-r...
3 - https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/health/coronavirus-schools-children.html https://www.nytimes.com/2020/10/22/health/coronavirus-school...
4 - https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/11/20/covid-19-schools-data-reopening-safety/?arc404=true https://www.washingtonpost.com/opinions/2020/11/20/covid-19-...
- DalasNoin 6y agoWhat I stated was that this person selected data in a way to support their theory and that i could easily select a data point that contradicted his theory. I did not claim that my single example proved some other theory, I did not state a preferred narrative as you claim. Please have a look at the guidelines, you should try to honestly understand my point. https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html https://news.ycombinator.com/newsguidelines.html