The problem with the article is a semantic one but it should not be overlooked. /e/ “believes” in open source. Less along the lines of “concerns itself with ev

The problem with the article is a semantic one but it should not be overlooked. /e/ “believes” in open source. Less along the lines of “concerns itself with every philosophical checkbox”. IMO you and the author are filling in the blanks as you wish, landing in the realm of no true Scotsman. Freedom to create as one would > flocks of sheep. Personal emotional religion must take a backseat to suggesting folks discuss or use their time otherwise.