5 ms·
I think I might be the exception on HN based on the current comments, as I am not in a hurry to get the vaccine. I know it has been in trials and appears to be
by sigmaprimus 6y ago
I think I might be the exception on HN based on the current comments, as I am not in a hurry to get the vaccine. I know it has been in trials and appears to be safe but I personally don't think enough time has passed to properly make that determination.
I feel is that it has been less than a year since the pandemic was declared and the fact that a vaccine using new synthetic RNA technology that has never been used before is being promoted before studying the long term effects is scary as hell.
How many years did we use Antibiotics before it became apperant that over-use results in super bugs?
There have been many other novel medications that have turned out to be less than good after they were studied over a longer duration of time. I am worried in 5 or 10 years from now, a whole bunch of people are going to get some new type of autoimmune disease, or liver cancer, or their yet to be concieved kids will get it, or something I can't even imagine right now.
I hope I am wrong and that everything works out but I feel this whole situation could use some sober second thought before jumping in head first and dose-ing a large percentage of the human species so quickly with a novel technology.
* Edit: I would also like to see antibody tests being done prior to vaccination as already having antibodies might result in negative reactions that were not studied in the current trials, not to mention the effect it would have on the statistics that will be used as a metric to encourage more people to get jabbed.
- voisin 6y agoSee, this is how I am feeling about it too, but I am not a doctor or scientist so I have no idea of these concerns are remotely plausible or not. I don’t understand the basic science surrounding this new vaccine type.
- enchiridion 6y agoWhile I understand the hesitation, it seems like you just pulled scary sounding diseases out of thin air. Is there any evidence pointing in that direction? I am not a biologist, but I have a basic understanding of how the mRNA vaccines work. As far as I know the protein the vaccine codes for is well understood. The only kind of sketch part to me is whatever complicated bio-chem is used to enable the uptake of the mRNA, but from what I've read it seems like that process is a one time thing, not some lasting DNA based change. Which is to say, at an intuitive level, I would expect to see any harsh side-effects immediately (hours to days). Again, just a layman's interpretation, like most of the anti-vax comments on here.
- Foober223 6y ago> Is there any evidence Well that's the rub for future unknowns. You don't know what specific issue you might be concerned about until it happens in the future. People in 1930 couldn't collect evidence for super bacteria as it was an unknown at that time. FYI, I'm getting the vaccine and trust the test results. Just pointing out unknowns are hard to provide evidence for or against.