I don't think that's a very representative view of what my post was about. I actively search for contrary opinion and dissenting facts. Hell this convo spurre

I don't think that's a very representative view of what my post was about. I actively search for contrary opinion and dissenting facts. Hell this convo spurred me to re-watch and re-read a bunch of the old criticisms. Regarding moon landing and antivaxxers being the same that is entirely false. There is plenty of evidence we landed on the moon, there is plenty of evidence vaccines work. Truthers don't argue if planes hit the towers. They argue the people behind the act were not those you have been lead to believe with little to no evidence. Truthers don't believe the narrative. And aside from the more extreme individuals that believe everything that Alex tells them, truthers don't disagree with facts. In fact truthers seek fact. The only problem is that they we were met with obstruction at every turn. When you're prevented from looking at the evidence, when the evidence is quickly cleaned up and destroyed without standard practice investigation taking place it leaves questions open for interpretation. You can't tell then me the sky is green, no you can't look, and no, your argument that it is blue is an argument from ignorance, how dare you open these old wounds.