> Basically, you've decided the fact checkers are somehow malicious actors, without any particular evidence of that actually happening, and vaguely labeled thei

> Basically, you've decided the fact checkers are somehow malicious actors, without any particular evidence of that actually happening, and vaguely labeled their speech as bullshit. Seems like nonsense[1] to me. ^ This is you stating that fact checking isn't used by malicious actors and there is no evidence to show it is. I just demonstrated with evidence that it is. You are now trying to twist your way out of this by equating "fact checkers" (IE major organisation presenting opinions as facts that are not up for debate) and the act of correcting misinformation as one and the same thing. Twisting of words is one of many dishonest tactics used by progressives in debate and it's the same one you are attempting to use right now. For the record, I'm good at pointing out dishonest tactics and people who use them in debate, I wouldn't continue. Also while this is going down this path, I'm going to bring up the narcissists prayer so we can refer back to it later if you continue with this approach.