3 ms·
Ah! I did encrypt it for: rsa4096/D817454384595412 2019-12-24 The formatting was messed up but it should be fixed now!
by rasengan 6y ago
Ah! I did encrypt it for: rsa4096/D817454384595412 2019-12-24
The formatting was messed up but it should be fixed now!
- tmp538394722 6y agoclears throat
- samatman 6y agothe difficulties here are illustrating some point about the perils of GPG, let's put it that way! rsa4096/0355E91DFA3EFAB3 2019-12-24, that's me lord knows how you have the right creation date with the wrong fingerprint... perhaps we can agree that we shouldn't be trusting our lives and freedom to this piece of software.
- rasengan 6y agoThe fingerprint is: Primary key fingerprint: A92D 5A61 7818 99B0 401F D8AC 0355 E91D FA3E FAB3 Which matches yours... Again, it really depends on the situation. I wouldn't trust sending an anonymous message through Signal for example as it is tied to a phone number, whereas, I'd happily post through a VPN an anonymous message somewhere on HN that would go unseen other than to the recipient who would be directed to it at a later date across a different medium for example.