It's still a '99% of people' solution. For the remaining people that really do want/need that last 1%, ML doesn't work. You can't infer data that does not exis

It's still a '99% of people' solution. For the remaining people that really do want/need that last 1%, ML doesn't work. You can't infer data that does not exist no matter how many samples you take. The resolution of every object is set by the optical resolution: a function of the wavelength and the NA of the lens [0]. Aside: super-resolution refers to nanoscopes that break the Abbe' diffraction limit of light [1]. The various set-ups do this in a few very clever ways so the specifics change exactly how well they resolve objects. [0] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_resolution https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Optical_resolution [1] https://www.microscopyu.com/techniques/super-resolution/the-diffraction-barrier-in-optical-microscopy https://www.microscopyu.com/techniques/super-resolution/the-... (a good intro to these nanoscopes)