We might not have read the same article. > Also, the fact it is written in rust means nothing to me. I'm one of the authors of Pijul, and the author of that p

We might not have read the same article. > Also, the fact it is written in rust means nothing to me. I'm one of the authors of Pijul, and the author of that post asked me a few questions when preparing that post, and that is addressed there: https://initialcommit.com/blog/pijul-creator https://initialcommit.com/blog/pijul-creator (see "Why did you choose to write Pijul in Rust?"). > It doesn't explain the technical aspects, it doesn't allow me to understand the system You can have plenty of that there: https://pijul.org/manual/theory.html https://pijul.org/manual/theory.html. > This was painful to read. I strongly disagree. Explaining the goals of this project isn't always easy, because both large complex projects and complete beginners can benefit from using a rigorous mathematical modeling. I guess this blog post leans more towards the "beginners" side, whereas the "Theory" page linked above would be more appealing to power users. Both are useful and important, they just appeal to different people.