4 ms·
Ivermectin is Effective for Covid-19: A Meta-analysis
- dm808 6y agoFrom the site: "•Ivermectin is effective for COVID-19. 100% of studies report positive effects. The probability that an ineffective treatment generated results as positive as the 21 studies to date is estimated to be 1 in 2 million (p = 0.00000048). •Early treatment is most successful, with an estimated reduction of 91% in the effect measured using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.09 [0.02-0.40]. •100% of the 8 Randomized Controlled Trials (RCTs) report positive effects, with an estimated reduction of 72% in the effect measured using a random effects meta-analysis, RR 0.28 [0.13-0.59]." Their sister site with descriptions of all studies: https://c19ivermectin.com/ https://c19ivermectin.com/ See also a treatment protocol by another very experienced group: I-MASK+ ivermectin treatment protocol: https://covid19criticalcare.com/ https://covid19criticalcare.com/ A short introduction: http://covidcare.fi/01.xhtml http://covidcare.fi/01.xhtml A brief review of the group's history: - on SSRN: https://ssrn.com/abstract=3723854 https://ssrn.com/abstract=3723854 (there is a "Download without registration" link) - on ResearchGate: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345694745 https://www.researchgate.net/publication/345694745 (please log in first)
- SomeoneFromCA 6y agoFor some reason there is a lot of taboos about Covid origins and treatments. - HCQ cannot be working, beacuse Trump; - Ivermectin cannot work, because it is too cheap and no incentive for research; - It absolutely cannot be out of the lab, neither as a leak, nor as an engineered virus. Because conspiracy. Notwithstanding that SARS leaked four times from the labs in China, and the fact that the lab was engaging in GoF experiments with SARS-like viruses.